PP2OID2-Oppression, Inequality, and the Enemies of Democracy 2

Module Provider: Philosophy
Number of credits: 10 [5 ECTS credits]
Level:5
Terms in which taught: Summer term module
Pre-requisites:
Non-modular pre-requisites:
Co-requisites:
Modules excluded:
Current from: 2019/0

Module Convenor: Dr Charlotte Newey

Email: c.newey@reading.ac.uk

Type of module:

Summary module description:

In this module you will consider the question: how should we be governed? The course will introduce you to key philosophical arguments concerning the meaning and value of freedom, equality and democracy. You will study both their defenders and their detractors.

Aims:

The programme of study in Philosophy is specifically designed to introduce you to progressive intellectual challenges and to consolidate your previous experience at each new level. This module will challenge you to analyse and evaluate philosophical arguments, and to articulate and defend your philosophical views in writing, in formal presentations, and in open discussion.

Assessable learning outcomes:

This module fits into our graduated, supervised programme for developing independent-learning skills. The module begins with the closely guided study of key philosophical arguments, assessed through your choice of pre-set essay questions and a group presentation. It builds towards more independent work by training you to effectively answer an essay question of your own choosing in the summer term.

Assessable outcomes

By the end of this module you will be able to:

• Analyse and evaluate central arguments in political philosophy.


• Explain different conceptions of oppression, inequality and democracy.


• Apply philosophical methods to current issues of policy and principle.


• Articulate and defend your views in a public forum.


• Write in a clear, rigorous and effective manner.


• Identify and respond cogently to the best criticisms of your positions.

Additional outcomes:

You will also develop your ability to:

• Examine your deepest beliefs and assumptions in a characteristically philosophical way


• Develop a sense of the significance of philosophical thinking in dealing with modern problems


• Supplement your guided study with independent research by following citations and using appropriate library resources.


• Manage a small independent project, identifying appropriate resources, managing your time, collaborating effectively and seeking help when needed.

Outline content:

The central themes on this course, oppression, inequality and democracy are complex and frequently interwoven. We will consider the different ways in which oppression arises and how different groups of people can be oppressed in multiple intersecting ways. We will consider the nature of freedom and ask what restrictions to freedom are permissible, and on what grounds. Is equality valuable for its own sake, or for other reasons? What kinds of equality are the most important? What makes a government democratic? What makes a government legitimate?Ìý What are the best arguments that reject the value of democracy?

Ìý

Brief description of teaching and learning methods:

The module is taught by project supervision. Students are expected to attend 15Ìýhours of meetings with their supervisor (in groups). All students are required to undertake one project from a list of project-assignment questions supplied by the module convenor. Students are encouraged to be active in all meetings, asking questions and trying to answer the questions posed by others. A reading list and sample questions will be given out at the start of the course.

Contact hours:

Ìý	Autumn	Spring	Summer
Project Supervision			15
Guided independent study:			85
Ìý	Ìý	Ìý	Ìý
Total hours by term	0	0	100
Ìý	Ìý	Ìý	Ìý
Total hours for module	100

Summative Assessment Methods:

Method	Percentage
Written assignment including essay	100

Summative assessment- Examinations:

Summative assessment- Coursework and in-class tests:

1 x written project-assignment, including essay

Formative assessment methods:

Penalties for late submission:
The Module Convener will apply the following penalties for work submitted late:

where the piece of work is submitted after the original deadline (or any formally agreed extension to the deadline): 10% of the total marks available for that piece of work will be deducted from the mark for each working day[1] (or part thereof) following the deadline up to a total of five working days;

where the piece of work is submitted more than five working days after the original deadline (or any formally agreed extension to the deadline): a mark of zero will be recorded.

The University policy statement on penalties for late submission can be found at:
You are strongly advised to ensure that coursework is submitted by the relevant deadline. You should note that it is advisable to submit work in an unfinished state rather than to fail to submit any work.

Assessment requirements for a pass:

A mark of 40% overall

Reassessment arrangements:

Written assignment, to be completed in August

Additional Costs (specified where applicable):

Last updated: 3 December 2019